- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- Read Chapter 1 in Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership.
- Read the original posts by your classmates in .
- Choose two of your classmates original posts, selecting at least one student that presents an opposite or differing approach to the ethics of the Borland case than your thread.
- Copy and paste your classmates’ original posts into your thread before composing your responses under them. Label your Posts “Your name reply to Student’s name”. Example: Sara Smith’s reply to John Doe.
- Each response must be separate and address the following:
- Clearly identify similarities or differences in your posts.
- Support and defend your position.
- Identify and discuss, from Chapter 1 reading, which shadow(s) Kahn exhibited and how do those shadows affect one of the stakeholders identified by the student whose thread you are replying to.
- Incorporate at least one scholarly source in addition to the textbook to support your conclusions and ideas, as well as the possible biblical application.
- Be at least 300 words in length or more.
- State reasons that support your conclusions, adding additional ideas/thoughts, or providing alternative ideas/thoughts.
- Be prepared in Workshop Three to compose a final rebuttal post to a classmate that responded to your initial post in this workshop.
