- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- Review from Workshop Three.
- You posted your stance on outsourcing within Inotech in Workshop Four.; in this workshop, you will choose two classmates arguments that took an opposite view as yours, see .
- Copy and paste your classmates’ original posts into your thread before composing your rebuttals under them. Label your posts “Your name rebuttal to Student’s name”. Example: Sara Smith’s rebuttal to John Doe.
- Each rebuttal shall be separate and address the following:
- Compare and contrast your view and your classmates’ viewpoints regarding the outsourcing of janitorial services.
- Analyze your classmates’ uses of the ethical framework and discuss why they errored in their outcome.
- Explain by using an ethical theory from Chapter 5 in your textbook to show how your classmates’ views are not ethical.
- Present new evidence to support your original stance in an effort to change the position of the classmate you are responding to.
- How does your ethical stance on outsourcing demonstrate Whites biblical principles (i.e., just weight, total honesty, being a servant, personal responsibility, and reasonable profits)?
- The rebuttal must be presented without personal attack or malice and in a courteous manner.
- Each rebuttal post needs to be composed with a minimum of 300 words.
- Your responses are due by the end of the workshop.
