Some feel that when former President Donald Trump had his social media accounts shut down after the attack on the Capitol on January 6th it was a violation of his 1st Amendment rights of free speech and that his accounts should be restored. Others have asserted that since he, like every other user on a social media platform, agreed to a Terms of Service agreement that includes the platforms exclusive right to rescind membership, has no legal argument at all and it is like an airplane kicking off an unruly passenger or a bar booting someone they think might start a fight. Which argument do you think has more merit and why? Be sure to use examples to support your key points.
