write a paper that reviews and critiques the two papers for that theme. Note that critique does not equal criticize; it just means evaluate the papers, pointing out strengths and weaknesses. Your overview of the articles should be brief with the focus on asking if the experimental manipulations provide a good test of the authors hypotheses? Were the methods sufficient to rule out alternative explanations? Can you think of alternative explanations to account for the data?
1. Learning/Reinforcement (abbreviation: LR)
a. Frank, M. J., Doll, B. B., Oas-Terpstra, J., & Moreno, F. (2009). Prefrontal and striatal dopaminergic genes predict individual differences in exploration and exploitation. Nature Neuroscience, 12(8), 10621068.
b. Guitart-Masip, M., Huys, Q. J. M., Fuentemilla, L., Dayan, P., Duzel, E., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect. NeuroImage, 62(1), 154166.
