Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? Episode 08: Part I: “WHATS A FAIR START?” Part II: “What do We deserve?
PART ONE: WHATS A FAIR START? Is it just to tax the rich to help the poor? John Rawls says we should answer this question by asking what principles you would choose to govern the distribution of income and wealth if you did not know who you were, whether you grew up in privilege or in poverty. Wouldn’t you want an equal distribution of wealth, or one that maximally benefits whomever happens to be the least advantaged? After all, that might be you. Rawls argues that even meritocracy—a distributive system that rewards effort—doesn’t go far enough in leveling the playing field because those who are naturally gifted will always get ahead. Furthermore, says Rawls, the naturally gifted cantclaim much credit because their success often depends on factors as arbitrary as birth order. Sandel makes Rawls’s point when he asks the students who were first born in their family to raise their hands.
PART TWO: WHAT DO WE DESERVE? Professor Sandel recaps how income, wealth, and opportunities in life should be distributed, according to the three different theories raised so far in class. He summarizes libertarianism, the meritocratic system, and John Rawls’s egalitarian theory. Sandel then launches a discussion of the fairness of pay differentials in modern society. He compares the salary of former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day OConnor ($200,000) with the salary of televisions Judge Judy ($25 million). Sandel asks, is this fair? According to John Rawls, it is not. Rawls argues that an individuals personal success is often a function of morally arbitrary facts—luck, genes, and family circumstances—for which he or she can claim no credit. Those at the bottom are no less worthy simply because they weren’t born with the talents a particular society rewards, Rawls argues, and the only just way to deal with society’s inequalities is for the naturally advantaged to share their wealth with those less fortunate.
Write to Learn. A sample of a one-paragraph essay is published for you on Brightspace. Your answer that does not have a form of one-paragraph essay will receive no credit. After watching “Episode 08” on Brightspace (What’s A Fair Start) by Prof. M. Sandel lecture, answer the following question in a form of a one-paragraph essay and upload the question along with your short essay to Brightspace, to a proper folder:
According to Rawls, the U.S. system of welfare is a symptom of injustice. Why does he claim so?
A moral Case Analysis: “A Speeding Ticket” in the light of John Rawls’s ethics.
After reading texts in Aristotle, Mill, Kant and Rawls answer the following question:
Why the goal of Introduction to Ethics is not to get an A? You must give at least three arguments to support your thesis
A moral Case Analysis: “A State Trooper” in the light of John Rawls’s ethics.
