Chapter 7 Outline
- What is leadership?
- Difficult to define; no consistent definition
- Two parts to many definitions
- Involves influencing members of a group
- Involves directing members’ efforts to the achievement of organizational goals
- What do leaders do?
- Explaining leadership
- Trait approach
- Traits/characteristics linked with effective leadership
- Traits/characteristics were primarily inborn
- Trait approach
- Examples: honesty, integrity, motivation, people-skills
- Evidence is questionable—are traits linked with leadership behaviors?
- Behavioral approach
- Leadership behavior rather than leadership characteristics
- Ohio State University studies identified two different dimensions
- Consideration
- Initiating structure
- Research studies were not able to identify the best combination of the two dimensions.
- Contingency theories/situational leadership
- There is no one best style of leadership; it all depends
- Examples
- Fielder’s contingency theory
- Styles
- Relationship oriented
- Task oriented
- Style determined by least preferred coworker (LPC) scale
- Contingency variables
- Group atmosphere
- Task structure
- Styles
- Fielder’s contingency theory
- Position power
- Operation
- When all are favorable or unfavorable= task-oriented
- When contingencies are mixed = relationship-oriented
- Hersey and Blanchard’s contingency theory
- Leadership styles
- Telling
- Selling
- Leadership styles
- Participating
- Delegating
- Contingencies
- Psychological readiness: willingness/eagerness to perform task
- Task readiness: ability to perform task
- Leadership style must adapt to readiness of followers
- Path-goal theory
- Leadership behavior
- Supportive
- Directive
- Leadership behavior
- Participative
- Achievement-oriented
- Contingencies
- Personal characteristics of group members: skills, abilities, willingness
- Work environment: clarity of task; power
- Operation depends on contingencies; for example, use a directive style when task is unclear. The goal is to allow workers to achieve goals
- Vroom and Yetton’s model
- Focuses on decision making and whether subordinates should be included in decision making to improve the process
- A decision tree is used considering a variety of factors (e.g., time available) in order to determine level of subordinate involvement
- Transactional leadership theory
- Focuses on interaction between leader and follower
- Two interaction processes
- Contingent reward leadership: manager helps subordinate reach goals by clarifying expectations, offering support, and providing structure
- Management by exception: manager interacts with subordinates only when subordinate deviates from expectations (fail to adhere to standards)
- Change leadership theories
- Leaders can change an entire organization
- Examples
- Charismatic leadership
- Produce change by having personality characteristics that attract followers
- Earn the trust and confidence of followers
- Transformational leadership
- Change the organization by motivating workers to achieve at higher levels
- Process
- Increase subordinates’ awareness of importance of task
- Increase subordinates’ awareness of their need for personal development
- Charismatic leadership
- Motivating subordinates to fulfill their goals and be a part of the organization’s success
- Dimensions
- Inspirational motivation
- Intellectual stimulation
- Idealized influence
- Individualized consideration
- Leadership styles
- Most famous is the managerial grid (Blake and Mouton)
- Two dimensions
- Concern for people
- Concern for results
- Combinations
- Contribute and commit
- Control and dominate
- Yield and comply
- Balance and compromise
- Evade and elude
- Leadership skills
- The assumption is that these can be taught through training/education
- Examples from the Competing Values Framework
- Clan skills
- Adhocracy skills
- Hierarchy skills
- Market skills
- Other skills
- Technical skills
- Human resource management skills
- Conceptual skills
- Criminal justice organizations
- Current status: authoritarian dominates
- Emerging research suggests worker preference for transformational or participative styles