One will represent the reading that you like the best and the other that you like the least. You will then write a comparative two (2) page, double-spaced essay where you will explain the reasoning behind your selections. Remember to make clear your thesis (which is your favorite and least favorite) upfront. The essay will then proceed to an evaluation of each readings strengths and/or weaknesses. Your analysis will explain the arguments presented by each author(in other words, what is the author trying to get across to the reader?). You then will appraise the strength of the articles argument (is it clear? does it address an important question? etc.), its use of evidence (does it provide enough information to support its claims? is it convincing?), its methodology (that is, does the authors approach to the topic work?), its writing style (is it readable? organized?), and any other criteria that you feel is important. In other words, why does the one essay succeed in making its case whereas the other one fails? What advantages and disadvantages does one have over the other? Remember to back up your opinions with examples and quotes from the two readings (e.g., just stating that something is poorly written is not the same as demonstrating it!). On a technical matter, there will be no need for formal citationsjust follow any quotes with the page number in parentheses. Referring back to the comments on the first submission should help improve this effort!
