75 words with reference as a response to this post
Ashley Brooke Goodwin
Here are five reasons for initiating a project evaluation. The reason includes you learn how to optimize for success and discover the story behind the results, evaluation paves the way to project improvements, every voice count, one size does not fit all, and DIY evaluation is possible (Levine, n.d.). When learning how to optimize for success and discover the story behind the result, evaluators ask these three questions at the beginning middle, and end of the project (Levine, n.d.). The three questions are What happened?, Why?, and Why do these results matter, and what is next? (Levine, n.d.). The next reason is the evaluation paves the way to project improvements this is when learning collaborative, teams collect data that monitor the progress and test change this is important for improvements (Levine, n.d.). Every voice count meant each person’s perspective is useful and is essential for the project (Levine, n.d.). One size does not fit all the mean evaluators many collect primary data from a variety of stakeholders via written survey, individual interview, and focus group discussions (Levine, n.d.). Evaluations include quantitative and qualitative data (Levine, n.d.). The last reason is DIY evaluation is possible is when evaluation adds a question or two onto another survey that may be field the purpose (Levine, n.d.).
Project evaluation can be inappropriate when the following occur (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.). The change in evaluation criteria while in an evaluation process (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.). When evaluation criteria are too vague or subjective (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.). Criteria that weighted too heavily on one technical component over another, or technical scores rather than price, or vice versa (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.). The failure to notify bidders of evaluation criteria and losing bidders of the reasons for their loss (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.). Allowing unqualified or inappropriate personal to participate in bid evaluations (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.). Lastly, using standing bid evaluation committer with the same committee member over an extended time (Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures, n.d.).
The first phase is the planning phase in these are the steps within this phase. Step 1: Build or Review a program logic model, Step 2: Define purpose and scope, Step 3: Budget for an Evaluation, Step 4: Select an Evaluator, and Step 5: Develop an Evaluation plan (Robles, n.d.). The next phase is the implementation which includes Step 6: Collect data and Step 7: Manage the Evaluation (Robles, n.d.). Analysis and Reporting is the next phase this includes Step 8: Analyze data and Step 9: Communicate findings (Robles, n.d.). The last phase is the action and improvement which includes the last step which is Step 10: Apply findings and feedback for program improvement (Robles, n.d.).
