Week 7- Leveraging Human Capital
Throughout this course, you have analyzed your current work environment to identify the acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. This project requires you to determine how to leverage the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.
Develop a written proposal (1,000-1,250 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:
- Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance on the job.
- How will you identify an employee’s strengths and skills to leverage their performance?
- Develop strategies to improve employee performance. How will you provide employees with rewards and incentives for performance improvement?
- How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain the employees?
- Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization, relative to the employees being the biggest asset.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Rubric
Tasks and Performance Indicators assessment
Tasks and Performance Indicators
16.5 points
Criteria Description
Tasks and Performance Indicators
5. Excellent
16.5 points
A comprehensive description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included.
4. Good
14.36 points
A clear description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included.
3. Satisfactory
13.04 points
A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and performance of employees.
2. Less than Satisfactory
12.21 points
The written proposal does not include a description of tasks and performance indicators.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included but is incomplete or lacks details.
collapse Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance assessment
Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance
16.5 points
Criteria Description
Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance
5. Excellent
16.5 points
There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance.
4. Good
14.36 points
There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance.
3. Satisfactory
13.04 points
There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance.
2. Less than Satisfactory
12.21 points
The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills but the description is incomplete or lacks details.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital.
collapse Strategies to Improve Performance assessment
Strategies to Improve Performance
16.5 points
Criteria Description
Strategies to Improve Performance
5. Excellent
16.5 points
The written proposal includes a comprehensive description of strategies to improve employee performance and thoroughly discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.
4. Good
14.36 points
The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance and discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.
3. Satisfactory
13.04 points
The written proposal includes a detailed description of strategies to improve employee performance and adequately discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.
2. Less than Satisfactory
12.21 points
The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance but they are incomplete or lack details.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The written proposal does not include strategies to improve employee performance.
collapse Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive assessment
Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive
16.5 points
Criteria Description
Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive
5. Excellent
16.5 points
The written proposal includes a clear description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.
4. Good
14.36 points
The written proposal includes an appropriate description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.
3. Satisfactory
13.04 points
The written proposal includes a vague description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.
2. Less than Satisfactory
12.21 points
The written proposal includes a thorough description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The written proposal does not include a description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive.
collapse Culture Within the Organization assessment
Culture Within the Organization
11 points
Criteria Description
Culture Within the Organization
5. Excellent
11 points
There is a well-developed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.
4. Good
9.57 points
There is a detailed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.
3. Satisfactory
8.69 points
There is some description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.
2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points
The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization but is incomplete or lacks details.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the organization.
collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
7.7 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
4. Good
6.7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
3. Satisfactory
6.08 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.7 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
collapse Argument Logic and Construction assessment
Argument Logic and Construction
8.8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
8.8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
7.66 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
6.95 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less than Satisfactory
6.51 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
5.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
4.79 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
4.35 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
collapse Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
5.5 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
4.79 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
4.35 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
collapse Documentation of Sources assessment
Documentation of Sources
5.5 points
