Reflection 1 599 Reflection 2 599 Reflection 3 599

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MHACB/599 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Capstone: Leading the Organization through Change
Competency Assessment Title: Capstone Project Part 1 and Part 2 – Defining the Health Problem and Program Design
Assignment Directions
This assessment has two parts, Part 1 and Part 2 of your Capstone project. Complete Part 1 and Part 2 and submit them together.
Part 1 – Defining the Health Problem
The state of health care in the United States is such that costs are sky-high; those who have health insurance get it through their employer, or it
can be purchased at a premium that is somewhat commensurate with income. Solving problems is a big part of the administrative work in health
care.
For your Capstone Project at the center of this course, you are to develop a health care program that addresses an evident need in a community.
The project will be completed in 5 parts.
Review the following documents in full to understand the scope of the project, requirements, and deliverables. You will also find instructions,
resources, and examples to guide you through the project.
• Capstone Project
• Capstone Project Calculations
Complete Part 1 of the Capstone Project document
Part 2 – Program Design
In this part, you progress to Part 2 of your Capstone Project, in which you further develop the program you conceived in Part 1 based on an
identified health care need in a community.
Part 2 begins the planning of strategic, operational, and financial decisions of starting and running such a program, including goal development,
facility, and staffing, and performing a SWOT analysis to determine the potential risks and opportunities of the proposed program.
Complete Part 2 of the Capstone Project document.
Cite any references to support your assignment.
Format your citations according to APA guidelines.
MHACB/599 Competency 1 Rubric
Page 2 of 4
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Submit your assignment, including both Part 1 and Part 2.
Resources
• Center for Writing Excellence
• Reference and Citation Generator
• Grammar Assistance
MHACB/599 Competency 1 Rubric
Page 3 of 4
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Competency Assessment Rubric
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
1. P1: County and
Hospital/Health
System/Clinic and Sources
of Data
(weight 10%)
Provided a clear and through
rationale as to why the city was
selected, including any prior
experiences or knowledge about
the existing health care system in
that city
Provided a general rationale as to
why the city was selected, including
any prior experiences or knowledge
about the existing health care
system in that city
Did not provide a rationale as to
why the city was selected, including
any prior experiences or knowledge
about the existing health care
system in that city
2. P1: Health Issues 1& 2
Description and Analysis of
Data and Description of
Condition(s)
(weight 25%)
Thoroughly explained the source(s)
of data and the types of analyses
conducted to reach the findings;
thoroughly described the
condition(s) identified in the data
analysis, the extent of the health
problems, and why they warrant a
program or service to address their
impact on the population; provided
complete demographic information
on the county population, including
age, gender, income, employment
and other relevant information for
the program; thoroughly
summarized the health 2 problem
affecting this population and how it
will be addressed
Generally explained the source(s)
of data and the types of analyses
conducted to reach the findings;
generally described the condition(s)
identified in the data analysis, the
extent of the health problems, and
why they warrant a program or
service to address their impact on
the population; provided partial
demographic information on the
county population, including age,
gender, income, employment and
other relevant information for the
program; thoroughly summarized
the health 2 problem affecting this
population and how it will be
addressed
Did not complete the description or
analysis of data or provide
description of the condition for
health issue 1
3. P2: Goals and
Objectives and Description
of Program and Facility
(weight 10%)
Developed a clear and appropriate
goal and 2 clear and appropriate
related objectives for the program;
thoroughly described the facility and
its services, including the target
population and demographics
Developed a somewhat appropriate
goal and somewhat appropriate
related objectives for the program;
generally described the facility and
its services, including the target
population and demographics
Failed to develop a goal or related
objectives for the program; did not
describe the facility and its services,
including the target population and
demographics
4. P2: Impact on
Marginalized Groups
(weight 10%)
Thoroughly examined the impact of
this program on uninsured, lowincome populations; provided a
clear answer to how these groups
Moderately examined the impact of
this program on uninsured, lowincome populations; provided a
somewhat clear answer to how
Did not examine the impact of this
program on uninsured, low-income
populations; did not provide an
answer to how these groups of
MHACB/599 Competency 1 Rubric
Page 4 of 4
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
of people will get access to the
services.
these groups of people will get
access to the services
people will get access to the
services
5. P2: Staffing and Support
(weight 10%)
Provided an accurate and clear
initial estimate of the staff required
to operate this facility, including
physicians, nurses, receptionists,
and other support staff;
appropriately and clearly applied
standards on the ratio of clinical and
support staff per physician
Provided a general initial estimate
of the staff required to operate this
facility, including physicians,
nurses, receptionists, and other
support staff; generally applied
standards on the ratio of clinical and
support staff per physician.
Did not provide an estimate of the
staff required to operate the facility;
did not apply standards on the
ration of clinical and support staff
per physician
6. P2: SWOT Analysis
(weight 10%)
Thoroughly evaluated the potential
strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats that can
impact the targeted outcome of this
program
Generally evaluated the potential
strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats that can
impact the targeted outcome of this
program
Did not evaluate the potential
strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats that can
impact the targeted outcome of this
program
7. P2: Policies, Procedures,
Incentives
(weight 10%)
Thoroughly described policies,
procedures, and incentives that
would make the program a
transformative work environment
Moderately described policies,
procedures, and incentives that
would make the program a
transformative work environment
Did not describe policies,
procedures, and incentives that
would make the program a
transformative work environment
8. P2: Literature Review
(weight 10%)
Conducted a thorough literature
review and listed at minimum 5
appropriate sources to identify
programs that exist to address the
identified health problem
Conducted a moderate literature
review and listed some appropriate
sources to identify programs that
exist to address the identified health
problem
Did not conduct a literature review;
did not list any sources
9. Grammar and Writing
Mechanics
(weight 5%)
Accuracy in grammar, sentence
structures, sentence boundaries,
and word choice enhanced content;
citations accurately formatted as
per APA guidelines.
Rare inaccuracies/errors in
grammar, sentence structures,
sentence boundaries, and word
choice did not detract from the
content; rare inaccuracies/errors in
formatting citations as per APA
guidelines.
Occasional or frequent
inaccuracies/errors in grammar,
sentence structures, sentence
boundaries, and word choice
detracted from the content;
occasional or frequent
inaccuracies/errors in formatting
citations as per APA format.