SOCIOLOGY IS THE SUBJECT
INFORMATION FOR TASK: In this section, we present the results of a rather poorly designed sociology study that investigatedgroup leadership dynamics. The study suffered from significant methodological flaws, limiting thereliability and generalizability of the findings. The researcher chose a small convenience sample frompersonal friends. The sample had 8 women and 3 men. Participants were given a brief questionnairewith open-ended questions and no survey. None of the participants was a group leader themselves.Each participant defined “group” and “leadership” according to their own personal understanding of theterms. Despite these limitations, the study reported some preliminary observations, which should beinterpreted with caution.1. Group Leadership Styles The study explored different leadership styles observed within groups.Based on self-report questionnaires, participants reported a mix of authoritarian, democratic,and laissez-faire leadership styles in their groups. No definitions of these leadership styles wereprovided to participants.2. Communication Patterns Participants provided anecdotal evidence of various communicationpatterns within their groups. Some groups reported open and effective communication,fostering collaboration and decision-making. Conversely, others mentioned challenges withcommunication, such as dominance of certain members or lack of participation. (Anecdotalevidence is personal stories that are collected because they seem interesting and related to thetopic.)3. Group Cohesion The study assessed group cohesion by asking participants to describe theirperceived sense of unity and cooperation within their groups. The results indicated a range ofexperiences, with some groups reporting high levels of cohesion and others reporting low levels.4. Impact of Leadership on Group Performance Participants were asked about the perceivedimpact of leadership on group performance. While some participants believed that effectiveleadership positively influenced group outcomes, others reported no significant relationshipbetween leadership and performance. There was no standardized measurement ofperformance.5. Gender and Leadership The study explored the potential influence of gender on leadershipdynamics within the groups. participants provided subjective accounts of gender-relatedexperiences in the workplace, including stereotypes and biases they think might impactleadership roles.
Overall, the results of this study provide only preliminary and inconclusive insights into group leadershipdynamics. Future research with improved methodological rigor is necessary to deepen ourunderstanding of group leadership and its impact on various outcomes.
TASK: This assignment should be at minimum 750 words. You are required to use the reading material in this Unit to address all the following questions in essay format: You should include in-text citations to the material.
Complete the assignment using the following format:1. Introduction (Paragraph 1): Identify 3 flaws in the research design that might impact the validity, reliability, and generalizability of the research outcomes. Explain why they are flaws. Define all terms and concepts (use your materials and in-text citations).2. First through Third body Paragraph
Paragraph 2 is Flaw 1: describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 1 (use your materials and in-text citations).
Paragraph 3 is Flaw 2: describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 2 (use your materials and in-text citations).
Paragraph 4 is Flaw 3: describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 3 (use your materials and in-text citations).
3. Conclusion Paragraph: Answer the following questions.
What do you think would be a good way to study group leadership dynamics?
What aspects of groups and leadership do you think are the most important to study?
What specific research methodologies would you choose?
Use your materials ( FILES ATTACHED ) and in-text citations.
