This assessment enables students to demonstrate understanding and application of core unit content. Students will need to select one (1)

ASSIGNMENTS
This assessment enables students to demonstrate understanding and application of core unit content. Students will need to select one (1) case study from those used in tutorials throughout the semester and answer a series of questions in a narrated PowerPoint. Topics will include assessment, psychoeducation, psychopharmacology, and nursing care and interventions when working with consumers with mental health issues.
This assessment encompasses content presented in online lectures, interactive online tutorials, and self-directed learning, throughout the 10-week semester.
Assessment Details:
Select one (1) case study from those presented during tutorials (e.g., Josh, Tony etc). Develop a PowerPoint presentation of no more than eight (8) slides. Your presentation should include:
Introduction slide
Five (5) slides to answer the questions (see below)
Conclusion slide
References
This must be a narrated PowerPoint, and your presentation should be between 8-10 minutes duration. You must include your script in the notes section of your PowerPoint. Your PowerPoint presentation must be submitted in the LEO drop box in your State/Territory as an ECHO360 capture. Please see the LEO assessment tile for further information about how to do this. Only PowerPoint format will be accepted (do not use Prezi, mp4 or any other presentation software). Students are responsible for the quality of the recorded file. It is strongly recommended you listen to the audio-visual recording of your presentation prior to LEO submission to ensure you can be heard clearly.
Your presentation must critically discuss the following questions in relation to your chosen case study:
1. The condition the consumer has.
2. One (1) pharmacological treatment.
3. One (1) legal/ethical issue.
4. One (1) nursing intervention and rationale.
5. The role of the multidisciplinary team in caring for someone with this condition.
Due date: 24th May 2021 by 23.59hrs.
Weighting: 40%
Length and/or format: Narrated PowerPoint presentation of 8 slides length and 8-1 Omins
duration. See LEO for further details.
Purpose: To measure students understanding of core mental health
concepts such as assessment, interventions, pharmacology and the role of the MDT.
Learning outcomes assessed: LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6
How to submit: Via the drop box in LEO
Return of assignment: Grades will be released on GradeBook
Assessment criteria: Students will be graded according to the marking rubric in Appendix 2.
NRSG263_Extended Unit Outline_FINAL DRAFT_ Australian Catholic University 2021
WORD COUNT
Writing requires skill and being able to write within a specified word limit is an essential component of professional and academic work. Reading and writing critically are fundamental skills which demonstrate an understanding and an ability to make judgements and solve problems, hence why only 10% of a word count should be direct quotes. That is, if the word count is 1500 words only 150 of those words should be direct quotes. Word counts provide students with an indication of the amount of detail and work required for each assessment item.
What is included in a word count?
Essentially, all text within an assessment item from the introduction through to the conclusion is counted in the word count. This includes all in-text citations, direct quotes and headings. The word count does not include the following:
Title page
Reference list
Appendices
Tables
Figures and legends

Word Limit: 2000 words (1000 per answer).
Instructions: Please answer TWO of the FOUR questions provided.
Submissions MUST NOT exceed the maximum word length. Footnotes and bibliography are not included in the word count.
All questions carry equal marks.
Please be sure that in your exam answers any verbatim quotation or close paraphrasing of sources (including the core textbook and lecture transcripts) is properly identified and attributed. Verbatim quotes must be in .. with a source and page number attribution (using OSCOLA). Close paraphrasing must be identified with a source and page number attribution. Failing to do so will amount to poor academic practice and may amount to academic misconduct. For further information, see the Undergraduate Students Handbook for information on plagiarism.
1. Ben used to be an ardent Reds FC supporter and had their team logo tattooed on his right arm. However Reds FC have performed terribly in the league and received so many red cards that Ben has developed a very deep hatred of the team. It is so bad that he now wants his arm taken off. He approaches his neighbour, Samir, who he knows was a renowned surgeon in his home country although hes not permitted to work in the UK. Ben invites Samir over to his house and then puts forward the plan. Ben has already sterilised a set of knives and brought clean towels, needles and thread. He says to Samir, take my arm off or Ill hurt your wife. In reality Ben actually has no intention to hurt Samirs wife. Samir hesitates but loves his wife very much so he decides to take a couple of Valium tablets and a shot of whisky to steady his nerves, and proceeds. Samir does a very careful job. At the same time, Bens daughter Kylie (16) films the whole procedure, planning to put it FlipFlop, a popular social media app.
Advise Ben, Samir and Kylie.
2. Annie and Dave meet on a dating app. They decide to meet at the Horse & Lamb, a local pub thats closed because of the pandemic. Here they hope to have some privacy and if there is some beer left in the pub, they plan to drink it. They enter the pub through the back door and make their way to the bar. They dont find any beer but they do find a couple of bottles of wine, which they decide to drink. Feeling jolly through the wine, they decide to have sex. Dave says to Annie, I want to have sex with you, but only if youre on the contraceptive pill. Annie says she is indeed on the pill, and they have sex. In fact, Annie isnt on the pill but just hopes she will be OK this one time.
Advise Annie and Dave.
3. The case of R v Gnango [2011] UKSC 59 illustrates the courts struggle to maintain a clear separation between principal offender and accomplice.
Discuss.
4. The cases of Harris [2013] EWCA Crim 223 and Taj [2018] EWCA Crim 1743 muddy the waters of the otherwise clear prior fault intoxication rules.
Discuss.
END OF ASSESSMENT
Page 2 of 2 ASSIGNMENTS SUBMITTED JUST BEFORE THE DUE DATE AND TIME
Please note that if you submit your assignment, notice that the similarity index is high but do not have time to revise your assignment before the due date has passed, then you are advised to:
contact the Lecturer in Charge and request that your assignment be removed.
revise the assignment, submit it within three days of the due date and incur a late submission penalty.
submit it into the regular drop box. Do not submit into the extension drop box. Please review the Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy if you choose not to do this.
REFERENCING
This unit requires you to use the APA 7th ed. referencing system.
See the Academic referencing* page of the Student Portal for more details.
ACU POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
It is your responsibility to read and familiarise yourself with ACU policies and regulations, including regulations on examinations; review and appeals; acceptable use of IT facilities; and conduct and responsibilities. These are in the ACU Handbook, available from the website.
A list of these and other important policies can be found at the University policies page of the Student Portal.
Assessment policy and procedures
You must read the Assessment Policy and Assessment Procedures in the University Handbook: they include rules on deadlines; penalties for late submission; extensions; and special consideration. If you have any queries on Assessment Policy, please see your Lecturer in Charge.
Please note that:
NRSG263_Extended Unit OutlineFINAL DRAFT_ Australian Catholic University 2021