This is an assignment of course Theorizing Crime, Law, and Social Justice.
Write a short argumentative essay (4-5 pages) of polemics, justice, and the nature of critical social science. This is a short, argumentative essay, so you will have to do some reflection and come up with your thesis statement.
FOLLOW THE ATTACHED DOC OF INSTRUCTION WHICH STATES WHAT IS THIS ESSAY ABOUT AND ALL OTHER DETAIL INSTRUCTION. You need to go through the readings ( I have attached) and write the essay from referring informations there.
Follow all the instruction in attached file
This assignment is not specifically about Foucault (although you may certainly discussFoucault in your assignment if your main argument warrants it), his imperative highlights a certaincontrast: sometimes we read theoretical work that is, like Foucault, somewhat descriptive andanalytical, but which avoids taking pronounced stances on questions of politics or (social) justice. Onthe other hand, some critical theorists do write with an overt sense of inequality, social or politicaljustice, liberation, or emancipation embedded in their work. Between the two poles, there is an entirespectrum of approaches to doing critical theorizing.
