As an example, e
states that girls are more likely to be affected by romantic relationships than are boys (Loftus et al., 2011, p. 801) and backs this up by citing a chapter by Carol Gilligan (1996). Unfortunately, that was not the message of Gilligans chapter at all, and so I believe it was a poor choice of those authors to cite that source the way they did.
For this weeks discussion, please share an article that you cited in your literature review, and then share one other article that cites the article that you chose.
- Explain how the authors of the second article used the first article: what did the authors of the second article claim or imply about the first article?
- Based on your understanding of the first article (this is the article that you are citing in your literature review), how accurately do you believe the second articles authors represented the first article?
- How well did the first article fit into the second articles aims and scope?
Please answer the questions above and offer some critique here, since every citation is an act of interpretation to an extent, and thus there is always room for us to critique that interpretation. Please remember to use in-text citations and provide references for both articles.
References:
Gilligan, C. (1996). The centrality of relationship in human development: A puzzle, some evidence, and a theory. In G.G. Noam & K.W. Fischer (Eds.), Development and vulnerability in close relationships (pp. 237-261). Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Inc.
Loftus, J., Kelly, B.C., & Mustillo, S.A. (2011). Depressive symptoms among adolescent girls in relationships with older partners: Causes and lasting effects? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 800-813.
