Please write 350 words!
In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s essay, “It’s Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligations,” Sinnott-Armstrong argues that there seems to be no general moral principle that could persuasively argue against the idea that I should be able to engage in behavior, such as “Driving a gas-guzzler just for fun.” Do you think that he is correct in his dismissal of the arguments he addresses, or do you agree with him that they are unsatisfactory and that other principles need to be sought after to argue against such behavior? Or, is there no problem at all. Whatever your position, please make the case using arguments.
Use page 521-534 Title: It’s Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligations
