Module 5 Discussion
Female Patient Cases 3
For this Discussion pick 1 to discuss.
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
| Cases | You work in a women’s health clinic. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the most common reasons women seek health care. | A new female patient, C.Y. 32-year-old patient consults your office because she presents hirsutism, clitoral hypertrophy and menstrual dysfunction. She also stated she has gain weight lately. You suspect of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). | Create a focused SOAP note to support (only include positive and pertinent data) for a 40-year-old female patient with diagnosis of Endometriosis. |
| Questions for the case | · Discuss and described the pathophysiology and symptomology/clinical manifestations of AUB.
· Discuss three differential diagnoses for AUB with ICD 10 numbers for each. · Discuss patient education. · Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological). |
· Discuss and described the pathophysiology and symptomology/clinical manifestations of Hyperandrogenism.
· Discuss three differential diagnoses for AUB with ICD 10 numbers for each. · Discuss patient education. · Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological). |
· Discuss and described the pathophysiology and symptomology/clinical manifestations of Endometriosis.
· Discuss three differential diagnoses for AUB with ICD 10 numbers for each. · Discuss patient education · Develop the management plan (pharmacological and nonpharmacological). |
Answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:
- An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.
- Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.
- Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.
Submission Instructions:
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
- You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
- All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
- Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
| Discussion Rubric | |||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Points | |||
| Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts |
Distinguished – 5 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts. |
Excellent – 4 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
Fair – 2 points Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
Poor – 1 point Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. |
5 points |
| Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Distinguished – 3 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Excellent – 2 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Fair – 1 point Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. |
Poor – 0 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. |
3 points |
| Response to Posts of Peers |
Distinguished – 2 points Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each. |
Fair – 1 point Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal. |
Poor – 0 points Student provided no response to a peer’s post.
|
2 points | |
| Total Points | 10 | ||||
