Capstone Case Study 3
Part II
This is a continuation of the health program proposal, part one, which you submitted previously. Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.
For this section of your assignment, include the following components:
7.Framework(minimum two paragraphs)
- Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal.
8.Outcomes(minimum two paragraphs)
- Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes concurrent with the SMART goal approach.
9.Detailed Plan(minimum three paragraphs)
- Provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome.
10.Barriers / Challenges(minimum two paragraph)
- Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges.
11.Conclusion(minimum two paragraphs)
- Conclude the paper with a conclusion paragraph. Don’t type the word “Conclusion”.
- In this section, you will share your insights about this strategy and your expectations regarding achieving your goals.
- This section should contain a well-rounded and comprehensive conclusion summarizing the paper and providing a call to action.
12.Reference
- APA/Formatting/References All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript, and listed in the references using the current APA 7th Edition of the manual.
Paper Requirements:
- Follow APA 7th Edition format guidelines.
- Use In-text citations properly.
- The final paper should be between 12-14 pages long (not including the title and reference page).
- All papers must be written in the 3rd
- Your proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school-level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about a Primary Care problem.
Clarity of Writing:
- Use standard English grammar and sentence structure.
- There should be no spelling errors or typographical errors.
- The paper should be organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
| Grading Criteria (II) | Ratings | Pts | |||||
| Framework |
15 pts (Excellent)
Thoroughly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
12 (Good)
Briefly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
8 pts (Acceptable)
Vaguely selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
5 pts (Needs work)
Poorly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
0 pts
Did not select and present a theoretical or conceptual model framework. |
15 pts | |
| Outcomes |
10 pts (Excellent)
Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. |
8 pts (Good)
Briefly described the intended outcomes. |
6 pts (Needs work)
Vaguely described the intended outcomes. |
4 pts (Poor)
Poorly described the intended outcomes. |
0 pts
Did not describe the intended outcomes. |
10 pts
|
|
| Detailed Plan |
25 pts (Excellent)
Provided a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
20 pts (Good)
Briefly provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome.
|
15 pts (Needs work)
Vaguely provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
10 pts (Poor)
Poorly provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
0 pts
Did not. provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
25 pts | |
| Barriers / Challenges |
15 pts (Excellent)
Thoroughly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
12 pts (Good)
Briefly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
9 pts (Needs work)
Vaguely described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
3 pts (Poor)
Poorly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
0 pts
Did not describe possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
15 pts | |
| Conclusion |
15 pts (Excellent)
The essay has a clear format with an introduction, body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document. |
12 pts (Good)
The paper has a clear format with an introduction, body with evidence and supporting arguments and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but may be missing transitions between sections, or has other small issues with organization. |
9 pts (Limited)
The paper structure has one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion. OR The conclusion does not take into consideration the information presented. OR Evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned. OR The flow of the document is difficult to follow. |
5 pts (Needs work)
The paper does not appear to have any structure. No introduction, progression of thought or defined conclusion.
|
0 pts
Not submitted
|
15 pts | |
|
Writing
Mechanics |
10 pts (Excellent)
Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. |
8 pts (Good)
Minimal (1-3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. |
5 pts (Needs work)
Multiple (4-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. |
2 pts (Problematic)
10 or more typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. |
0 pts
Not submitted
|
10 pts
|
|
|
Information Literacy
Correct application of APA 7th Edition |
10 pts (Excellent)
Flawless execution of APA. Correct formatting, setup, title page, and perfect citations and references. |
8 pts (Good)
Correct formatting, setup, title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors in the citations or references. |
6 pts (Needs work)
Correct formatting, setup, title page, but significant errors with citations and references.
|
2 pts (Problematic)
Incorrect formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic citations and references. |
0 pts
Not used APA style |
10 pts
|
|
| THE MAXIMUM SCORE FOR THIS ACTIVITY IS 100 POINTS, ACCOUNTING FOR A TOTAL OF 15 PERCENT OF THE STUDENT’S FINAL GRADE. | SCORE (POINTS): | ||||||
| GRADE (PERCENT): | |||||||
Literature Review Template
Use the “Literature Review Template” as a guideline to help you sort through your thoughts, note important points and think through the similarities and differences:
You are organizing the review by ideas and not by sources. The literature review is not just a summary of the already published works, it is your synthesis and should show how various articles are linked.
| Source/Reference | Problem/Purpose | Sample | Methods | Findings | Limitations |
| Example et al., 2019 | Examine the work patterns of hospital staff nurses to identify a possible relationship between hours worked and frequency of errors | Convenience sample 24 nurses (LPNs, RNs with both ADN & BSN preparation) 1-26 years of experience | Compared three groups of nurses during eight cycles of medication administration | Distractions
Failure to follow the five rights of medication administration or protocol
Lack of focus
Poor communication |
Observer influence may have affected behavior.
Only one nurse observed at a time.
Nurses not observed while in the patient’s room |
| Author 1 | |||||
| Author 2 | |||||
| Author 3 |
