2/26/23, 6:49 PM Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DHA/DHA8032/220400/Scoring_Guides/u08a1_scoring_guide.html 1/2
Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 8
Percentage of Course Grade: 30%.
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Critically compare
findings between
Week 4 case study
of learner and one
other learner.
15%
Does not critically
analyze differences
between Week 4
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes one
difference
between Week 4
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes at least
two differences and
one similarity
between Week 4
case study of learner
and one other
learner.
Describes at least three
differences and two
similarities between Week 4
Case study of learner and
one other learner; OR finds
three differences and two
similarities between learner’s
summary and two other
learners, allowing some mix
and match.
Critically compare
findings between
Week 5 case study
of learner and one
other learner.
15%
Does not critically
analyze differences
between Week 5
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes one
difference
between Week 5
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes at least
two differences and
one similarity
between Week 5
case study of learner
and one other
learner.
Describes at least three
differences and two
similarities between Week 5
Case study of learner and
one other learner; OR finds
three differences and two
similarities between learner’s
summary and two other
learners, allowing some mix
and match.
Critically compare
findings between
Week 6 case study
of learner and one
other learner.
15%
Does not critically
analyze differences
between Week 6
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes one
difference
between Week 6
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes at least
two differences and
one similarity
between Week 6
case study of learner
and one other
learner.
Describes at least three
differences and two
similarities between Week 6
Case study of learner and
one other learner; OR finds
three differences and two
similarities between learner’s
summary and two other
learners, allowing some mix
and match.
Critically compare
findings between
Week 7 case study
of learner and one
other learner.
15%
Does not critically
analyze differences
between Week 7
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes one
difference
between Week 7
case study of
learner and one
other learner.
Describes at least
two differences and
one similarity
between Week 7
case study of learner
and one other
learner.
Describes at least three
differences and two
similarities between Week 7
Case study of learner and
one other learner; OR finds
three differences and two
similarities between learner’s
summary and two other
learners, allowing some mix
and match.
Create an APA
compliant table
showing the
comparison of
Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7
as summarized in
the paper.
30%
Does not create a
table.
Creates a table
with comparisons
that are not APA
compliant.
Creates an APA
compliant table
showing the
comparison of
Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7
as summarized in
the paper, with some
small formatting
errors.
Creates an APA compliant
table showing the comparison
of Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7 as
summarized in the paper,
which includes properly
setting up the table’s number,
title, and any needed notes..
Write a clear and
concise introduction
Does not create an
introduction to the
Writes a wordy,
too brief, or
Writes a clear
introduction with a
Writes a clear and concise
introduction to the paper, with
2/26/23, 6:49 PM Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DHA/DHA8032/220400/Scoring_Guides/u08a1_scoring_guide.html 2/2
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
to the paper, with a
thesis.
5%
paper. random
introduction with
no thesis or with
an irrelevant
thesis.
thesis. a thesis, in proper APA format
and style.
Write a clear and
concise summary to
the paper, tying back
to the original thesis
of the paper.
5%
Does not write a
summary to the
paper.
Writes a wordy,
too brief, or
random summary
with no tie-in to
the introduction’s
thesis.
Writes a clear
summary to the
paper, tied to the
thesis of the
statement.
Writes a clear and concise
summary, tied well to the
thesis, and in proper APA
format and style.
