Need to respond 2 times to each classmate’s presentation Rochelle and Erin.
First response to each colleague can be detailed the second can be 1-2 paragraph.
Respond at least 2 times each to all colleagues who presented this week (should be 2-3 presenters each week). The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients. Provide a response to 1 of the 3 discussion prompts that your colleagues provided in their video presentations. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient.
Rubric
| PRAC_6675_Discussion_Participant_Rubric |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponses |
|
85 to >76.0 pts
Excellent
Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources…. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
76 to >67.0 pts
Good
Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by 2 or more credible sources…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
67 to >59.0 pts
Fair
Responses are on topic and may have some depth…. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed.
|
59 to >0 pts
Poor
Responses may not be on topic and lack depth…. No credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication…. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing.
|
|
85 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation |
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Responses are carried out over multiple days between Days 4 and 7.
|
13 to >11.0 pts
Good
Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, over at least 2 days.
|
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
Participants respond at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, but responses may occur all in 1 day.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not meet requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week.
|
|
15 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
Need to respond 2 times to each classmate’s presentation Rochelle and Erin.
First response to each colleague can be detailed the second can be 1-2 paragraph.
