Week 1 Project
Hide Assignment InformationTurnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.Instructions
Project Plan
The course project flows from Week 1 to Week 5. For the course project, you need to choose a project topic and submit it for your instructor’s approval. The instructor may assign a project scenario if the proposed project topic is not deemed adequate to meet the learning objectives of the course.
After the approval, you will submit specific project deliverables each week.
In Week 5, you need to submit a final written plan and a presentation of the project. You are encouraged to use Microsoft Project (or other project management software tools), but its use is not required for this introductory project.
The project deliverables for each week are as follows:
WeekDeliverablesWeek 1
- The proposed project topic paper
Week 2
- The statement of need
- The statement of the goals and objectives of the project
- Stakeholder and project requirements
- The project scope statement
Week 3
- The project communications plan
- Project risk assessment
- The organization and human resources plan
Week 4
- The WBS
- The project schedule and budget
Week 5
- The project control plan
- The project closeout plan
- The final presentation and paper
For this week, identify an industry for the project and a 2-3 page synopsis of your chosen project. In your synopsis, provide a rationale for how the project will meet the course objectives and describe the anticipated scope and project outcomes.
You should carefully consider the scope of the project so that you can complete the necessary work in the compressed time frame of this course.
Submission Details:
- Submit your proposed project in 2 to 3 page Microsoft Word document, using APA style.
- Name your document SU_PMC6601_W1_ LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
- Submit your assignment to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
Due DateMay 3, 2022 12:59 AMHide Rubrics
Rubric Name: PMC6601 Week 1 Project Rubric
Print RubricCriteriaUnsatisfactory0 pointsBelow Expectations13 pointsEmerging15 pointsMeets Expectations17 pointsExceeds Expectations20 pointsCriterion ScoreProposed industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project.
Did not identify industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project.
Unsupported with research.
Identified industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project.
Lacked credible research support.
Described industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project.
Weakly supported with research.
Proposal of industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project was compelling and showed well-developed logical progression.
Well supported by research.
Proposed industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project.
Sufficiently supported with research.
Score of Proposed industry, anticipated scope, and anticipated outcomes of the project.,/ 20Defended how the proposed project will meet project objectives.
Did not identify project objectives.
Unsupported with research.
Identified project objectives.
Lacked credible research support.
Described project objectives.
Weakly supported with research.
Proposal of how the proposed project will meet project objectives was compelling and showed well-developed logical progression.
Well supported by research.
Proposed how the proposed project will meet project objectives.
Sufficiently supported with research.
Score of Defended how the proposed project will meet project objectives.,/ 20CriteriaUnsatisfactory0 pointsBelow Expectations6 pointsEmerging7 pointsMeets Expectations8 pointsExceeds Expectations10 pointsCriterion ScoreWrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, audien
Submission contains no discernible overall intent in author’s selection of ideas.
Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension.
No attempt at Academic/APA formatting in presentation
Submission contains random presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent.
Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension of majority of the work.
Academic/APA format is attempted, but errors are significant.
Ideas are presented in a way that forces the reader to make repeated inferences in order to identify and follow the author’s overall intent.
Errors in basic writing conventions interfere with, but do not prevent, reader comprehension.
Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting.
The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated.
The reader noticed a few errors in basic writing conventions but these few errors do not interfere with reader comprehension.
Using Academic/APA format, accurately. Errors are noticeable but minor.
The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and tightly focused, leaving the reader with no room for confusion about author’s intent.
Text is basically error free, so that a reader would have to purposely search to find any errors that may be present.
Using Academic/APA format proficiently. Text is basically error free.
Score of Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Communication: Use of tone, word choice, audien,/ 10TotalScore of PMC6601 Week 1 Project Rubric,/ 50
Overall Score
Unsatisfactory
0 points minimum
Below Expectations
32 points minimum
Emerging
37 points minimum
Meets Expectations
42 points minimum
Exceeds Expectations
50 points minimum
