My Research Proposal Abstract
My research proposal on how gender ideology has an impact on religious beliefs challenges traditional understandings of gender roles and identities and often conflicts with religious teachings that emphasize strict gender norms. It questions binary conceptions of gender and advocates for fluidity and equality. This conflict creates tensions and debates within religious communities. Gender ideology also promotes recognizing and including marginalized gender identities and sexual orientations, challenging religious doctrines that view them as deviations. Issues like reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ rights further contribute to the discord between gender ideology and religious beliefs. The impact of this varies among religious traditions, with some embracing inclusivity and others rejecting it, resulting in ongoing dialogue and potential change within religious communities and society.
The method used to address the proposed hypothesis was to organize a survey of 50,000 randomly selected individuals from diverse religious denominations. The results of the survey provided feedback that could be used to support the initial question regarding the impact gender ideology has on the religious beliefs of the participants. Through discussion of the survey results, it was found that the findings were inconclusive, and required further investigation. For clarification and proof of providing sound research methodology, a copy of the informed consent and debriefing forms were provided to support that the proper research methods were followed.
Kayan’s Abstract
I appreciated and saw value in Kayan’s assessment of how the research process adds value to your level of understanding, regardless of the focus. Analyzing how a revision of the corporate structure so that it reflected the values of Gen X, Gen Z, and Babyboomers, provided valuable insight into how to improve an evolving corporate infrastructure.
David’s Abstract
David’s research proposal for how changes in how corporate entities switched gears from an in-person workforce to that which was working remotely during the Covid-19 epidemic, provided an important look at how employees who have been working from home may respond negatively to a push to have them return to in-person performance. Given this eventuality, I agree with his assertion that employee satisfaction may be adversely affected if employees who enjoyed the freedom of working from home rejected the notion to return to the office.
