In your response posts to at least two other peers’ initial posts, address the following: Describe how the peers’ responses impact healthcare reimbursement from the organizational perspective. Explain why deductibles and co-insurance may or may not be a component of the estimate that Patient Scheduling would share with the consumer. Speak in first person
First, introduce yourself to the class. Include your major and anything you would like to share about yourself. Then address the prompt below. Assume that you work for a healthcare organization and a patient wants to learn more about the cost for a procedure ordered by their provider. They have asked the following questions to … Read more
You have seen throughout the course that not-for-profit organizations play a unique role in meeting the needs of humanity. The organizations created to meet these needs are as diverse as the needs themselves. In this discussion, you will apply what you’ve learned in this course to your understanding of the future of not-for-profit organizations. Answer … Read more
Not-for-profit organizations use many fundraising strategies to accomplish their missions. Some of these strategies include planned giving, grants, corporate gifts, sponsorships, and individual contributions. Answer the following questions in your initial discussion post: If you were the CEO of a not-for-profit organization, which two fundraising methods would you choose, and why? Provide a link to … Read more
pick 2 of my classmates discussions, read them ame write a small response . make sure you read the instructions and include all necessary information in the responses. instructions & classmates discussion attached .
In response to two peers, address the following: Compare your analysis of the case to your peers’ viewpoints. In places where you disagree, offer a competing understanding of where the priorities lie. In areas where you agree, add additional evidence to support the consensus. Compare your disciplinary perspective to that of your peers. If you … Read more
In response to two peers, address the following: Compare your analysis of the case to your peers’ viewpoints. In places where you disagree, offer a competing understanding of where the priorities lie. In areas where you agree, add additional evidence to support the consensus. Compare your disciplinary perspective to that of your peers. If … Read more
In response to two peers, address the following: Compare your analysis of the case to your peers’ viewpoints. In places where you disagree, offer a competing understanding of where the priorities lie. In areas where you agree, add additional evidence to support the consensus. Compare your disciplinary perspective to that of your peers. If you … Read more
I need a short response for 2 different discussions . I attached the instructions , pick 2 people and write a response for each . There are specific things that need to be addressed in the responses which is also included.
In responding to at least two of your classmates’ posts, offer an assessment of their recommendations and make an argument for at least one different recommendation. Be sure to offer an explanation for your alternative recommendation. Speak in first person