Tax Research


ACCT 6356.501 Tax Research – Fall 2022

 

 

 

 

Name __________________

 

 

 

RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT 10

Tax Practice & Procedure

 

 

( Please submit as a Word documentby email by 4:00 p.m.onThursday, 11/10.)

 

 

This assignment is worth a maximum of five (5)points.Your workshould be written in your own wordswithout any “cutting & pasting”from the source docu-ment(s) citedexcept that very brief quotations are acceptableif properly attri-buted.Points will be deducted for –

 

  1. spelling and grammatical errors that Word highlighted but you failed to correct;
  2. other egregious errors, including substantive misstatements;and
  3. material departures (in either direction) from the indicated length.

 

Any submissions received after 4:00 p.m. will be worth up to three (3) points only. Submissions not received by 7:00 p.m. will not be scored (zero points).

 

 

*     *     *     *

 

 

 

 

 

 

You’re the newest young partner at Smart & Smarter, LLP, and your life just became much more interesting. That’s because the senior partner, on his way out the door yesterday for a week’s vacation, asked you to take on a brand new client who was coming in later. You happily did so, and . . . wow!

 

The new client’s name is Rona Muck. Here’s her story:

 

Until last month Rona had been employed by Big Corp. She’d been there for 15 years, working her way up from clerk to Assistant Tax Director. Hadbeen there, because she was unceremoniously fired after reporting a questionable situation to Big’s General Counsel. She’d done that only because the Tax Director, her boss, had reacted very badly when Rona challenged his version of reality…

 

Basically, Big’s largest operating segment, its civil engineering group, had “cook-ed the books” – the tax books, not the GAAP books. Last year it had earned a performance bonus of $150,000,000 from Big’s largest customer by completing a huge project in half the scheduled time. But, despite that the $150M was treated as GAAP revenue, Big’s tax return omitted it from gross income. Instead it was treated as borrowed money (a loan). How? By latching onto a fine-print clawback provision the contract saying that the $150M would have to be repaid by Big in the event that something went seriously wrong within seven (7) years from the date of completion, and that something was Big’s.

 

Rona had been excluded from all meetings and discussions about this $150M. But she had gotten her hands on a report written to Big’s directors by one of the engineers, a report stating flatly that the odds of such a fault ever occurring were “less than 1% of 1%.” “Claim of right doctrine!” Rona had said to herself, fully ex-pecting the $150M to be included on Big’s 1120. But it wasn’t, which Rona found out about only after the returnhad beenfiled.

 

It turns out that Rona’s boss, the Tax Director,somehow had been persuaded by a “substantial authority” tax opinion prepared by (in)famous outside tax lawyer Joe Garza. The opinion concludedthat recognizing the $150M in gross income could wait until the 7-year guarantee period expired.Rona had demanded to see this nonsensicaltax opinion. She was refused access to it.

 

Livid over having been fired, Rona wants to file a whistleblower claim with the IRS. “Simple!” she says. “$150M understatement of taxable income! $150M x 21% = $30M+ underpayment of tax!Add on the 20% penalty, add on interest – around $40M total!  IRS pays us 30% = $12,000,000! Smart & Smarter takes 1/3, I take 2/3, we all retire!”

 

You tell Rona that you’ll prepare an “action plan,” a retainer agreement, and a POA (Form 2848), and have everything ready for her to come back and sign next week. But firstyou need to prepare a memo to the senior partner,recapping Rona’s story (very briefly) and outlining the whole whistleblower process. You need to do this because you’ve been told by the other partners that Rona is Smart & Smarter’s first-ever whistleblower client.

 

Around 1,000 words should be sufficient. (For comparison, this entire document around 675 words.)