Find or construct a graph of the US deficit for the last 100 years. Including the graph you found or constructed, prepare a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation (excluding title and reference slides) on the U.S. deficit. You can explore the history of the deficit, the growth, how it is calculated, what contributes to it, if it is necessary, etc. After researching the deficit, write a conclusion on the current state of our deficit and how it impacts our government spending and the overall economy.
With a turn-it-in report less than 5 percent of plagiarism
Presentation Rubric
40 to >34 pts
Exemplary
The presentation clearly addresses all aspects of the directions. The ideas contained in it are clear, based in solid logic, and concise at all times. The work provides multiple textual examples and details that clearly support the ideas presented within it. The topic is thoroughly explored in detail.
34 to >20 pts
Meets Expectations
The presentation addresses all aspects of the assignment directions. The ideas contained in it are usually clear, based in logic, and concise. The work provides some textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it. The topic is explored with sufficient detail.
20 to >10 pts
Developing
The presentation addresses most aspects of the assignment directions. The ideas contained in it are general, lack solid logic and/or wordy. The work provides few textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it. The topic is explored at a general level.
10 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
The presentation does not address any aspect of the assignment directions. It contains limited to no idea and lacks solid logic foundation. The work provides no textual examples or details to support the ideas presented. OR No presentation submitted or submitted late. OR The presentation contains plagiarized content.
/ 40 pts
Discussion/Evaluation
view longer description
40 to >34 pts
Exemplary
The discussion very effectively summarizes the main points and wraps up the presentation. Highly rational arguments or evaluations are skillfully used to persuade audiences and to substantiate logical points. All information presented is accurate.
34 to >20 pts
Meets Expectations
The discussion summarizes the main points and wraps up the presentation. Rational arguments or evaluations are used to persuade audiences and to substantiate points. Most information presented is accurate.
20 to >10 pts
Developing
The discussion is somewhat weak, but makes an attempt to summarize the main points and wrap up the project. Only ordinary arguments or evaluations are used to substantiate points. Some information is clearly not accurate.
10 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
The discussion is very weak with no attempt made to provide main points in the project. Limited to no arguments or evaluations are used. Most information is inaccurate. OR No presentation submitted or submitted late. OR The presentation contains plagiarized content.
/ 40 pts
Quality of Sources, References and Citations
view longer description
40 to >34 pts
Exemplary
Relevant scholarly sources used. Made a clear connection between the research and the assignment. Documented correctly per APA style. Citations are included where necessary.
34 to >20 pts
Meets Expectations
Scholarly sources used. Sources are generally strong. All citations and references are included though there may be minor errors in the use and formatting of citations. APA is used with minor violations.
20 to >10 pts
Developing
Sources are mostly strong, but are lacking in variety or timeliness. Many cited sources present have quite a few formatting errors. Format of document reflects incomplete knowledge of standard.
10 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
No sources used or sources are not representative of research. APA style is not supported. Format is not recognizable. OR No presentation submitted or submitted late. OR The presentation contains plagiarized content.
/ 40 pts
Presentation
view longer description
15 to >11 pts
Exemplary
Presentation meets the minimum number of slides required. Presentation addresses all required components including Speakers’ notes for each slide; a title slide; an introduction slide; and a reference slide. Presentation shows strong evidence of reasoned reflection and depth.
11 to >7 pts
Meets Expectations
Presentation meets the minimum number of slides required. Presentation addresses all required components including Speakers’ notes for each slide; a title slide; an introduction slide; and a reference slide. Presentation demonstrates adequate reflection.
7 to >3 pts
Developing
Presentation does not the minimum number of slides required by 1 slide. Presentation addresses all required components including Speakers’ notes for each slide; a title slide; an introduction slide; and a reference slide. Presentation demonstrates limited reflection.
3 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Presentation does not the minimum number of slides required. Presentation fails to address the selected topic. It manifests no evidence of reflection. Major revision needed. OR No presentation submitted or submitted late. OR The presentation contains plagiarized content.
/ 15 pts
Technical Quality
view longer description
15 to >11 pts
Exemplary
There are no errors in formatting. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are impeccable.
